The Iran-US proposal has introduced a new diplomatic approach aimed at breaking the deadlock in negotiations, focusing first on maritime security and de-escalation before addressing nuclear issues.
According to reports, Tehran has submitted a plan to Washington through mediators, proposing a phased agreement centred on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and lifting the US naval blockade on Iranian ports.
The proposal suggests either a long-term extension of the ceasefire or a broader agreement to end hostilities, with nuclear discussions postponed to a later stage.
Strategic importance of Hormuz
The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical energy corridors, through which a significant share of global oil exports passes.
Iran’s proposal aims to shift negotiations away from the complex nuclear file to a more immediate issue – restoring free navigation and easing economic pressure caused by restrictions on oil exports.
However, analysts warn that such an approach could weaken Washington’s leverage if maritime agreements are reached without binding commitments on Iran’s nuclear programme.
Internal divisions in Tehran
The proposal also reflects internal divisions within the Iranian leadership regarding potential concessions.
The US has demanded strict conditions, including a suspension of uranium enrichment for at least a decade and the removal of enriched material from Iranian territory – terms widely viewed as unacceptable by parts of Iran’s political and military establishment.
As a result, postponing nuclear talks may serve as a strategy for Tehran to buy time and avoid internal political friction.
Washington faces strategic dilemma
For Donald Trump, the proposal presents a complex decision.
A deal on the Strait of Hormuz and a potential end to hostilities could be framed as a diplomatic success. However, accepting it without firm nuclear guarantees risks being seen as a concession.
Trump has maintained a “maximum pressure” approach, stressing that economic restrictions, including the naval blockade, will continue to push Iran towards compromise.
Diplomatic activity intensifies
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has launched a series of diplomatic engagements to support the initiative.
Recent visits included talks in Islamabad with regional mediators, discussions in Oman on maritime security, and meetings in Russia, where Vladimir Putin plays a key role as a strategic ally.
Moscow has reportedly offered to manage Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, potentially providing a pathway to ease tensions.
Talks remain uncertain
Despite increased diplomatic efforts, uncertainty surrounds the future of negotiations.
A planned meeting between US and Iranian officials in Pakistan was cancelled over unclear positioning from Tehran, highlighting the fragile trust between the two sides.
While the White House has acknowledged receiving the proposal, it has not confirmed whether it will formally engage with it. US officials continue to stress that any agreement must guarantee that Iran will never acquire nuclear weapons, a central condition shaping Washington’s stance.
Critical weeks ahead
The coming weeks are expected to be decisive as both sides assess their next moves.
Tehran appears to favour a gradual approach, starting with practical issues such as maritime access and economic relief, while Washington remains focused on securing long-term guarantees on nuclear activity.
Also read: 2028–2034 budget, Middle East and Ukraine in EU plenary
For more videos and updates, check out our YouTube channel
