President Nikos Christodoulides yesterday described his administration as a government of “specific philosophy and specific ideological-political framework; social liberalism”. The statement sparked widespread discussion about what the term actually means.
Social liberalism is an evolution of classical liberalism. It adds one crucial belief: true individual freedom is impossible without basic social security. Its aim is to combine rule of law and economic freedom with policies that reduce social inequalities.
Historical roots
At the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century, thinkers argued that freedom is meaningless without basic social conditions. John Stuart Mill promoted the idea that personal autonomy requires education, health and social protection, services only the state can guarantee.
British philosophers T.H. Green and L.T. Hobhouse laid the theoretical foundations. They saw the state not as a threat but as a tool to empower citizens and secure positive rights. This thinking underpinned early welfare-state reforms.
Role of the state
Unlike traditional liberalism, social liberalism accepts active state intervention. The state must ensure access to healthcare, education and basic services, creating a safety net that allows citizens to develop without fear of collapse.
Economic dimension
The market remains central but regulated. Social liberalism supports entrepreneurship and innovation provided they operate within frameworks that prevent abuse of power and guarantee fair competition. Economic freedom is a means, not an end.
Rights at the core
The ideology emphasises both individual and social rights, from freedom of expression to gender equality and support for LGBTQI+ communities. A modern democracy must protect all minorities and offer equal opportunities.
Differences from related ideologies
It stands apart from social democracy by remaining more market-friendly and accepting less interventionist. It also rejects neo-liberalism’s belief that the free market alone can deliver social justice.
Criticism on “social liberalism”
Many on the Left accuse social liberalism of trying to please everyone, ending up with vague or compromise positions. They claim it fails to clearly identify who is responsible for inequalities and offers mild regulation instead of deep structural reform, and ultimately reproduces inequality while leaving big business largely unchecked.
More liberal and conservative voices argue it overburden the state with interventions that slow growth, foster dependency on welfare and undermine personal responsibility. Its strong focus on minority rights and inclusion draws fire from traditional circles, who say it prioritises “identity politics” over economic and class issues.
A 21st-century ideology
Despite the criticism, social liberalism is gaining ground in many Western democracies as an attempt to address inequality, technological change and social polarisation. It proposes a framework where individual prosperity and social cohesion can coexist, without sacrificing either freedom or solidarity.
Also read: National Council after Christodoulides–Erhürman–Holguín meetings
For more videos and updates, check out our YouTube channel
