US report finds high lead levels in protein powders

Date:

More than a dozen protein powders tested by the US consumer group Consumer Reports contained dangerous or concerning levels of lead, according to an investigation published on Tuesday.

The organisation also noted that the average lead level found in these products has increased compared with previous years.

Out of the 23 protein powders tested, more than two-thirds contained more lead in a single serving than what a person can safely consume in a day (0.5 micrograms).

Two of the products contained such high lead concentrations that Consumer Reports advised consumers not to use them at all.

“We do not recommend the daily use of most protein powders because many contain high levels of heavy metals and none are essential to meet your protein goals,” said Tunde Akinleye, lead researcher at Consumer Reports.

Protein-rich foods and supplements have surged in popularity across the wellness industry in recent years, both in the US and Europe, partly because protein increases satiety and helps prevent overeating.

They are also commonly used by athletes aiming to build muscle mass.

However, some health experts warn that Americans already consume more protein than necessary — and additional intake through enriched supplements, shakes, or processed foods may be excessive.

Also read: Forty-six dangerous products flagged by EU alert system
For more videos and updates, check out our YouTube channel

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Family of five struggles to cope with poor living conditions in Moutallos

A family of five has been living in a...

Molchanov sets world record with 137-metre dive in Limassol

Alexey Molchanov has set a new freediving world record...

Cyprus TV switches to DVB-T2 on 10 October: What viewers need to know

Cyprus is entering the next phase of its transition...

EU Parliament backs resolution against Muslim Brotherhood

The European Parliament reportedly approved a resolution targeting the Muslim Brotherhood on Thursday, 8 October 2026, calling for a European strategy to address what the EU describes as "Islamist entryism" and the influence of networks linked to the organisation. According to the voting figures provided, the resolution passed with 381 votes in favour, 167 against and 15 abstentions. Of Cyprus's six MEPs, only Geadis Geadi of ELAM was recorded as participating in the roll-call vote. He voted in favour, while the other five Cypriot representatives were not recorded as having voted. The distinction is important, as not participating in a vote is not the same as formally abstaining. What the resolution proposes The resolution calls for a common European approach to identifying practices described as "Islamist entryism", with particular emphasis on transparency in organisational funding, institutional partnerships and the potential use of EU programmes to gain political influence. The term "entryism" refers to a strategy whereby individuals or organised groups seek to influence established political institutions, organisations or social structures from within to advance their ideological objectives. The concept has its roots in political history, particularly the tactics employed by certain Trotskyist organisations during the 20th century. In this context, "Islamist entryism" is used to describe similar tactics allegedly employed by certain political Islamist networks. The European Parliament also calls on the Council of the EU to examine whether specific individuals and organisations associated with the Muslim Brotherhood meet the legal criteria for inclusion on the EU's terrorist list. The resolution does not automatically ban the Muslim Brotherhood and is not legally binding legislation. Controversy over Muslim youth organisations The resolution makes particular reference to FEMYSO, a federation of Muslim youth and student organisations in Europe that has faced questions concerning its funding and relationships with European institutions. The European Network Against Racism (ENAR), meanwhile, has rejected allegations of links to the Muslim Brotherhood. ENAR criticised the resolution as targeting Muslim organisations and groups working to combat discrimination. How the European political groups voted According to the figures provided, the Muslim Brotherhood resolution received most of its support from the European People's Party (EPP), the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), Patriots for Europe, Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN) and a significant proportion of Renew Europe. The Socialists, Greens and the Left opposed the resolution. How Cyprus's six MEPs voted Geadis Geadi of ELAM was the only Cypriot MEP recorded as voting in favour of the resolution. The remaining five Cypriot MEPs did not participate in the roll-call vote: Loucas Fourlas Michalis Hadjipantela Costas Mavrides Giorgos Georgiou Fidias Panayiotou None of the five was recorded as formally abstaining. Six Greek MEPs voted in favour, three against Of Greece's 21 MEPs, nine participated in the roll-call vote. Six voted in favour: Vangelis Meimarakis, New Democracy Manolis Kefalogiannis, New Democracy Dimitris Tsiodras, New Democracy Galato Alexandraki, Greek Solution Emmanouil Fragkos, Greek Solution Nikolaos Anadiotis, Niki Three voted against: Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos, Communist Party of Greece (KKE) Kostas Papadakis, Communist Party of Greece (KKE) Maria Zacharia, Course of Freedom The remaining 12 Greek MEPs, including representatives of PASOK and SYRIZA, did not participate in the vote. No Greek MEP was recorded as formally abstaining. The European Parliament...