Ukraine Starshield restrictions remain despite Trump’s claim

Date:

Ukrainian officials report continued disruption

US President Donald Trump on Thursday claimed that Elon Musk had restored Ukraine’s access to a military-grade version of his Starlink internet service, called Starshield, but Ukrainian officials have said restrictions remain in place that are complicating Kyiv’s war effort.

Trump declined to say whether he’d personally requested the Starshield restoration from Musk, telling reporters at the White House, “Whether I called or whether somebody else called, doesn’t make any difference, I guess. The bottom line – he put it back.”

But those restrictions remain in place despite the comments from Trump, Ukrainian officials said on Friday morning.

For more than a week, the restrictions have disrupted any military ordnance moving at high speeds – hindering interceptor drones in defending against Russian attacks and upending Ukrainian military operations in many areas of the front line, Ukrainian officials have said.

“At this time, we are not observing any lifting of restrictions on Starlink,” said Serhiy Beskrestnov, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. “There are isolated cases where Starlink may operate slightly faster than the restrictions allow, but this is likely due to the SpaceX algorithm or specific usage conditions, rather than a lifting of the restrictions.”

Signal losses affecting Ukrainian drones

A Ukrainian Defense Ministry source told CNN on Friday morning that “there is currently no confirmation that the restrictions have been lifted” and “instances of signal loss are still being observed” for any military ordnance travelling above 100 miles per hour (161 km per hour).

“There are definitely speed limits; nothing has changed yet, at least from what I can see here,” a Ukrainian Armed Forces officer told CNN. “It makes coordination difficult; sometimes there are interruptions. The connection drops out for 10 to 15 seconds.”

“We lost a lot of assets, much more than usual,” the officer added, saying the restrictions have affected reconnaissance drones and drones with Starlink-equipped systems on board.

A third source familiar with the situation told CNN on Thursday afternoon that speeds are not unlimited, and any restored access is “clearly not enough to intercept jet-powered drones” launched by Russia.

Ukraine is waiting for information and clarification from the US side about the situation and there is no response yet, the source said.

Questions over who authorised the restrictions

Trump and some of his top officials had denied making the call to throttle Ukraine’s use of the Starshield service, without offering any clear explanation for what had actually happened. Earlier this week, Trump said he was not involved.

Musk also denied taking unilateral action, pointing the finger toward the Trump administration. “Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS,” he said in a social media post last week.

American newspapers, including The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, are reporting that Trump called Musk last week to request he restore Ukraine’s full access to the satellite communications network.

On Thursday, Trump declined to answer questions about a Wall Street Journal report that said he had directly asked Musk to restore service for Ukraine.

“I don’t want to comment one way or the other, but my relationship with Elon is a very good one,” the US president said.

Source: CNN


Also Read:
For more videos and updates, check out our YouTube channel

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

ON THIS DAY: 3.4-billion-year-old fossils revealed (1977)

On 23 October 1977, palaeontologist Elso Barghoorn announced the discovery of fossilised single-celled organisms estimated to be 3.4 billion years old, offering remarkable evidence of life on the early Earth. The announcement highlighted the possibility that microscopic life had emerged relatively early in Earth's history, long before plants, animals or other complex organisms appeared. Barghoorn was known for his pioneering work in palaeobiology, particularly his research into ancient microorganisms and the origins of life. Why ancient microfossils matter Unlike the fossilised bones and shells commonly associated with prehistoric life, ancient microfossils can be extremely difficult to identify. Their structures are tiny, and geological processes over billions of years can alter or obscure their original appearance. Researchers study these specimens to understand when life first appeared, what early organisms may have looked like and the environments in which they survived. Evidence of such ancient life is also important to astrobiology, as scientists investigate whether similar conditions might have supported microorganisms elsewhere in the solar system. The continuing search for Earth's earliest life The interpretation of some of the world's oldest proposed microfossils remains a subject of scientific debate. Structures that resemble microorganisms can sometimes form through non-biological processes, making independent chemical and geological evidence essential. Nevertheless, Barghoorn's work helped establish the study of ancient microscopic life as a major field of scientific research. Nearly half a century after his 1977 announcement, the search for Earth's earliest organisms continues to reshape our understanding of how life began.

Supreme Court upholds New Hampshire student ID limits

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed New Hampshire officials...

Trump asked Google to rename Atlantic Ocean

Donald Trump said Google rejected his request to rename...

Magnitude 7 earthquake in Tiber kills 16

At least 16 people have died and dozens were...