Judge Varoshiotou dismissal upheld by Supreme Court

Date:

Objection against termination rejected

The Supreme Court has rejected the objection filed by judge Doria Varoshiotou against the decision on her dismissal.

Reading out its ruling, the court noted that the decision was not unanimous, and referred in detail to the background of the case. It stressed that the appointment of judges on a probationary basis is a long-standing judicial practice.

Probationary appointments and evaluations

The Supreme Court explained that judges appointed on probation are assessed over a two-year period and are confirmed in their post only if deemed suitable. Evaluation reports are submitted every six months, and it is the continuous duty of the Judicial Council to assess whether a judge possesses both the required legal knowledge and the appropriate character for the role.

No arbitrariness or interference found

The court underlined that Varoshiotou was aware she had been appointed on probation and that her appointment was made by an independent body, the Judicial Council. It found no evidence of arbitrariness or external interference in the process.

“The Judicial Council is subject to review by the Supreme Constitutional Court. The applicant never disputed that her appointment was not permanent. The authority of the Council not to proceed with the confirmation of a judge must be recognised,” the ruling stated.

No pressure or lack of impartiality

The Supreme Court further noted that Varoshiotou did not receive instructions or pressure, nor was there any lack of impartiality on the part of the president of the Judicial Council.

Serious legal errors cited

The court found that Varoshiotou conducted judicial proceedings outside the scope of the legislation, and identified serious weaknesses and legal errors in the death inquest into Thanasis.

It concluded that the assessment of unsuitability reached by the Judicial Council was justified. The court also noted that the questions raised did not meet the requirements for referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union, while there was an attempt to apply Article 19 without considering the full range of relevant facts.


Also read: Occupied Municipalities Committee continues with Lefkoniko deputy mayor
For more videos and updates, check out our YouTube channel

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Sirens at dawn: when Turkey launched the 1974 invasion of Cyprus

For 52 years, dawn on 20 July has been...

Videogate investigation: Video aimed to harm Cyprus

The criminal investigator leading the Videogate investigation has concluded...

President stresses need to resume Cyprus talks and end occupation

President of the Republic Nikos Christodoulides said on Monday...

Oil prices top $90 a barrel amid rising Middle East tensions

Oil prices rose above $90 a barrel during Asian...