US House holds vote on halting Iran war, rebuking Trump

Date:

Measure seeks to limit presidential war powers

The US House of Representatives has passed a measure that seeks to halt President Donald Trump from taking further military action in Iran.

The 215-208 vote, which is largely symbolic, was successful after four Republicans joined Democrats in a public show of disapproval of the war, which began in February.

The vote was to adopt the war powers resolution, which requires Trump to withdraw US forces or seek congressional approval for the conflict.

It is unclear how much legal force this House measure would have. The White House has dismissed the merits of the resolution, saying it is an unconstitutional attempt to restrict presidential power.

Pressure grows on White House

But its passing is significant because it adds to the pressure on the White House to find an end to the Iran War, as petrol prices have spiked and public opposition to the war has increased.

This was the fourth attempt by the House to rein in Trump’s war powers. The Senate advanced a similar resolution in May but has yet to hold a full floor vote.

The measure considered on Wednesday was a concurrent resolution. If it is also passed by the Republican-controlled US Senate, it would not require the president’s signature, though it could be subject to a legal challenge.

The vote on Wednesday marked the latest sign of division within Trump’s Republican Party, coming just days after a revolt by conservatives in Congress led his administration to pull back plans for a $1.8bn “anti-weaponization” fund for political allies.

Republicans join Democrats

In the House, Republicans Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett, and Warren Davidson joined a united front from Democrats to pass Wednesday’s resolution. Democrat Jared Golden of Maine, who had previously voted against similar measures, gave his support this time.

“Congress alone declares war, that’s something certainly we need to be protective of,” Barrett, a Republican from Michigan, said. Asked if he was worried about retribution from Trump for his vote, Barrett said: “I vote my conscience for what I think is right and willing to accept that.”

Representative Gregory Meeks, the leading Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs committee, described the vote as “a significant bipartisan rebuke of President Trump’s illegal and costly war in Iran and the first step toward ending it once and for all”.

Meeks said that Trump had failed to achieve the war’s stated aims while pushing up fuel prices at home and making a diplomatic solution to Iran’s nuclear programme even more difficult to achieve.

“The passage of this [measure] today signals a significant turning point: more and more Republicans are listening to their constituents who do not want another open-ended war in the Middle East,” Meeks, who co-sponsored the resolution, said.

Conflict and ceasefire efforts

The US and Israel launched strikes against Iran on 28 February. Iran responded by attacking Israel and US-allied states in the Gulf, and effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global shipping.

In April, the US announced it would impose a blockade on ships travelling to or from Iran’s coast.

The US and Iran reached an initial ceasefire agreement on 8 April.

Despite that agreement, the US has struck Iran in recent days, with Tehran responding with strikes on Kuwait, a US ally. Ahead of the vote, Trump again asserted that negotiations to end the war are going “very well” and could be finalised as soon as this weekend.

“We hit them pretty hard the night before, and actually last night,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Wednesday, referring to strikes in Iran. “Some people would say they were slightly provoked because we took a strong action for a different reason, so they were reciprocating.”

The president added that most of the members of his administration are hoping to end the conflict soon with a deal “without killing everybody”.

“In theory they’re pretty close to signing a paper, we’ve actually gotten along with them very well.”

Source: BBC


Also read: Cyprus Parliament elects new Speaker today in first e-vote
For more videos and updates, check out our YouTube channel

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

ON THIS DAY: 3.4-billion-year-old fossils revealed (1977)

On 23 October 1977, palaeontologist Elso Barghoorn announced the discovery of fossilised single-celled organisms estimated to be 3.4 billion years old, offering remarkable evidence of life on the early Earth. The announcement highlighted the possibility that microscopic life had emerged relatively early in Earth's history, long before plants, animals or other complex organisms appeared. Barghoorn was known for his pioneering work in palaeobiology, particularly his research into ancient microorganisms and the origins of life. Why ancient microfossils matter Unlike the fossilised bones and shells commonly associated with prehistoric life, ancient microfossils can be extremely difficult to identify. Their structures are tiny, and geological processes over billions of years can alter or obscure their original appearance. Researchers study these specimens to understand when life first appeared, what early organisms may have looked like and the environments in which they survived. Evidence of such ancient life is also important to astrobiology, as scientists investigate whether similar conditions might have supported microorganisms elsewhere in the solar system. The continuing search for Earth's earliest life The interpretation of some of the world's oldest proposed microfossils remains a subject of scientific debate. Structures that resemble microorganisms can sometimes form through non-biological processes, making independent chemical and geological evidence essential. Nevertheless, Barghoorn's work helped establish the study of ancient microscopic life as a major field of scientific research. Nearly half a century after his 1977 announcement, the search for Earth's earliest organisms continues to reshape our understanding of how life began.

Supreme Court upholds New Hampshire student ID limits

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed New Hampshire officials...

Trump asked Google to rename Atlantic Ocean

Donald Trump said Google rejected his request to rename...

Magnitude 7 earthquake in Tiber kills 16

At least 16 people have died and dozens were...