DISY MP Nikos Sykas appeared again before the Supreme Court regarding an immunity lift request. His lawyer, Christos Pourgourides, agreed legally that immunity should not shield MPs from criminal code violations tied to personal or business activities, it covers only parliamentary duties. On facts, he raised concerns: alleged offences occurred in Greece where complainant and Sykas were alone.
Pourgourides contested “victim” label without conviction, stressing precise language. The complainant withdrew her allegation, questioning proof without her testimony. No parents, children, or shouts witnessed the incident. He noted gender violence laws aim to limit abuse claims potentially involving threats or pressure.
AG assistant defends legality
Assistant AG Savvas Angelidis countered that the complainant’s sworn statement refusing court testimony bears no relevance to the request’s substance.
Case law clearly states courts assess neither evidence sufficiency nor quality, only the AG decides material. The application meets all criteria non-arbitrarily; Article provisions prove clear.
Angelidis affirmed “victim” terminology follows law. Courts focus on satisfied legal thresholds.
Approach ban and MP statement
The court issued a restraining order barring Sykas from approaching the complainant. Exiting court, Sykas stated immunity does not represent him, he fully believes in equality before law. Despite withdrawal, he facilitates justice completely.
Also read: DISY MP Nikos Sykas faces immunity lift hearing
Subscribe to our Youtube channel for the latest updates.
