Nurses promotion row erupts over “superior’s recommendation”

Date:

Anger is boiling over among state hospital nurses after the 27 November 2025 promotion row sparked accusations of unfairness and political meddling.

The biggest flashpoint is a new criterion introduced by the Public Service Commission (PSC): the “recommendation of the immediate superior”, worth 0–15 points; a decisive chunk of the final score.

Nurses speaking to SigmaLive say the rule has already caused blatant distortions:

  • Candidates with weaker records leapfrogged more experienced colleagues
  • Unequal treatment between departments and hospitals
  • Evaluations that ignore real service and qualifications

Many now feel the system rewards connections over merit.

Claims of political party interference

Beyond the scoring, nurses openly accuse political parties of behind-the-scenes pressure, with some promotions allegedly influenced by party affiliations and union deals.

“The cycle repeats itself” one nurse said, referring to identical complaints during the last senior nursing promotions a few months ago.

The result: dozens of nurses are preparing legal action, both administrative appeals and court challenges.

Deep morale blow

After years of dedicated service, especially through the pandemic, many feel betrayed.

“The feeling that hard work no longer counts is devastating,” a senior nurse told SigmaLive.

Union sources say a wave of lawsuits is now “almost certain” unless the process is suspended and reviewed.

The Health Ministry and OKYPY insist the final decision lies with the independent Public Service Commission.


Also read: 70-year-old pedestrian dies after being struck by car

For more videos and updates, check our YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@sigmaliveen.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

ON THIS DAY: 3.4-billion-year-old fossils revealed (1977)

On 23 October 1977, palaeontologist Elso Barghoorn announced the discovery of fossilised single-celled organisms estimated to be 3.4 billion years old, offering remarkable evidence of life on the early Earth. The announcement highlighted the possibility that microscopic life had emerged relatively early in Earth's history, long before plants, animals or other complex organisms appeared. Barghoorn was known for his pioneering work in palaeobiology, particularly his research into ancient microorganisms and the origins of life. Why ancient microfossils matter Unlike the fossilised bones and shells commonly associated with prehistoric life, ancient microfossils can be extremely difficult to identify. Their structures are tiny, and geological processes over billions of years can alter or obscure their original appearance. Researchers study these specimens to understand when life first appeared, what early organisms may have looked like and the environments in which they survived. Evidence of such ancient life is also important to astrobiology, as scientists investigate whether similar conditions might have supported microorganisms elsewhere in the solar system. The continuing search for Earth's earliest life The interpretation of some of the world's oldest proposed microfossils remains a subject of scientific debate. Structures that resemble microorganisms can sometimes form through non-biological processes, making independent chemical and geological evidence essential. Nevertheless, Barghoorn's work helped establish the study of ancient microscopic life as a major field of scientific research. Nearly half a century after his 1977 announcement, the search for Earth's earliest organisms continues to reshape our understanding of how life began.

Supreme Court upholds New Hampshire student ID limits

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed New Hampshire officials...

Trump asked Google to rename Atlantic Ocean

Donald Trump said Google rejected his request to rename...

Magnitude 7 earthquake in Tiber kills 16

At least 16 people have died and dozens were...